Yeah, no, Bucky always goes for the worst interpretation... But actually what I meant, was that by any reasonable standard, it would be Bucky with the prior claim on Steve, not Sam, especially since they were lovers as well as friends in Brooklyn in this version of the story... Though a generous view of it might be that James does think of himself as someone different from the old Bucky, as I understood part 6 to say?
Re: more for less, 5/?