garbage all the way down (
trashmod) wrote in
hydratrashmeme2014-11-15 10:27 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Chatter post
For all your discussion needs.
Ground rules:
- Try to keep it loosely trash party related, or at least Cap fandom related.
- Disagreement is fine, nastiness is not.
- Being offended is not carte blanche for nastiness.
- Trashmeme ground rules apply. Read at your own risk, no romanticizing your noncon garbage, no wank about the moral acceptability of noncon kink.
- Body shots, sniper shots, and tetanus shots are all available at the open bar. Party like it's 2014, kids.
Ground rules:
- Try to keep it loosely trash party related, or at least Cap fandom related.
- Disagreement is fine, nastiness is not.
- Being offended is not carte blanche for nastiness.
- Trashmeme ground rules apply. Read at your own risk, no romanticizing your noncon garbage, no wank about the moral acceptability of noncon kink.
- Body shots, sniper shots, and tetanus shots are all available at the open bar. Party like it's 2014, kids.
Re: Popularity of an Idea =/= On Topic-ness of the Idea
(Anonymous) 2018-06-08 12:48 am (UTC)(link)The newcomers know how much is too much by the prompt freezes. Freezing so much in a row with stricter standards than usual may have been a harsh move, but trashmod followed it up with an explanation. "A little" is up to the mod's discretion, so you prompt nonsexual violence at your own risk, especially if there's already some nonsexual prompts recently preceding yours. I suspect with the creation of the new meme, that leaves room for stricter policing of this meme as well. Though of course I can only speak to my own opinions.
Mainly in my first post I was taking issue with the idea that older nonsexual violence posts should make nonsexual violence okay now simply because those were some of the most popular fills. If a newcomer has trouble interpreting what is meant by "dirtybadwrong" then they get a frozen prompt or two, figure it out, and either leave for the new meme or stick around for the sexy noncon once they get a clearer idea of what the meme is mainly for. If a lot of people leave who weren't the target audience of the meme in the first place, that doesn't really hurt the target audience, and in fact might be more beneficial than if they all stuck around continuing to pull the original meme off course. It's not being mean, it's just saying, "This sandbox was built for a very specific purpose we couldn't find easily elsewhere, so while you should be happy to write whatever you want to write about, that particular thing doesn't quite fit here and is starting to overwhelm the things that are supposed to be here."
Re: Popularity of an Idea =/= On Topic-ness of the Idea
(Anonymous) 2018-06-08 01:15 am (UTC)(link)Re: Popularity of an Idea =/= On Topic-ness of the Idea
(Anonymous) 2018-06-08 01:17 am (UTC)(link)Re: Popularity of an Idea =/= On Topic-ness of the Idea
(Anonymous) 2018-06-08 01:17 am (UTC)(link)Re: Popularity of an Idea =/= On Topic-ness of the Idea
(Anonymous) 2018-06-08 01:38 am (UTC)(link)Re: Popularity of an Idea =/= On Topic-ness of the Idea
(Anonymous) 2018-06-08 08:32 am (UTC)(link)Re: Popularity of an Idea =/= On Topic-ness of the Idea
(Anonymous) 2018-06-08 09:27 am (UTC)(link)How do you know that the prompts were posted by a bunch of different people who had been here forever? LOL. I find it REALLY interesting that more than a dozen new prompts all in the very specific non-sexual body horror vein were all posted within the space of a day when for months there's maybe been one or two new prompts a day, if any at all. It was like a tsunami wave after the barest trickle. So yeah, it feels a lot more likely that a few newbies inundated the thread with the HTP-adjacent prompts rather than a bunch of old hat HTPers all got to jonesing for some straight-up body horror at exactly the same time. Just saying.
Regardless, it's clearly about the sudden volume of prompts with this theme and I'm not sure why that's so hard to understand.
Re: Popularity of an Idea =/= On Topic-ness of the Idea
(Anonymous) 2018-06-08 10:22 am (UTC)(link)1. People complaining about an increase in activity with prompts that might not necessarily be exactly what they're looking for, but technically don't break any rules. All the frozen prompts were HYDRA/CATWS related, non-AU, no evilgoodguys, no fluff, and they requested a high level of distressing graphic content. So while they might not be a crowd favourite, they didn't break any of the rules outlined in 'what's not on topic'. So why not let them be and move on? No one's forcing anyone to fill or read anything they don't like.
2. Select few people framing this as some sort of 'new vs. old' discussion. Not only does this approach make the entire community feel self-absorbed at best and extremely unfriendly and unlikeable at worst, but it's also hard to take seriously as this is an internet kink meme. Yes, there is a tremendous amount of skill and creativity in the content created here, but still, it's superhero fanfiction. Getting old high and mighty about the 'good old days' like you're a rich old man in a three piece suit smoking a cigar and complaining about young whippersnappers being out of line, or a feudal lord mildly inconvenienced by revolting peasants is just. Not only conceited and unfriendly but also kind of laughable. And I really don't get why people on here would want to create this kind of impression.
Re: Popularity of an Idea =/= On Topic-ness of the Idea
(Anonymous) 2018-06-08 05:58 pm (UTC)(link)