trashmod: (Default)
garbage all the way down ([personal profile] trashmod) wrote in [community profile] hydratrashmeme2015-09-09 07:23 pm

Dumpster #3: The Great Pacific Garbage Patch

Holy shitballs, look at us go. Welcome to Captain America fandom's resident wretched hive of scum and villainy: ROUND THREE. AKA Bad Guys Do Dirtybadwrong Things To Your Faves, AKA the Hydra Trash Party kinkmeme. As usual, BLANKET NON-CON AND NSFW WARNINGS apply: just assume going in that everything in this landfill is unfit for human consumption.

Rules in brief: don't be a jerk except to fictional characters, warnings for particularly fucked-up garbage are nice but not required, thou shalt not judge the trashiness of thy neighbor's kinks unless thy neighbor is trying to pass off their rotting banana peels and half-eaten pizza crusts as a healthy romantic dinner for two, off-topic comments may be chucked out of the dumpster at management's discretion, management's discretion decrees that omegaverse, soulbond AUs, D/s-verse, non-superpowered AUs, and dark!good guys AUs are off-topic.

[Round 1] [Round 2] [Fill post] [Chatter post] [hydratrashmeme Pinboard archive (maintained by [personal profile] greenkirtle)] [Round 3 in flat view (comments in non-threaded chronological order, most recent last)]

Round 3 is closed; comments and fills in existing threads are still welcome, but all new prompts go to Round 4.

Re: more for less, 5/?

(Anonymous) 2016-01-18 01:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Anothe thing that kills me is Bucky's offhand thought that Sam has the "prior claim" on Steve but fortunately "James had been something they could share, and so he does his best to be good for both of them"!!! Nooooo!!!

Re: more for less, 5/?

(Anonymous) 2016-02-01 09:25 pm (UTC)(link)
Yay, I'm glad that line worked for you! :D The natural follow-up thought there - to the idea that Sam had the prior claim on Steve, and might resent Bucky - was that Steve turned out to be someone that Sam and Bucky could share. But - nope!

Re: more for less, 5/?

(Anonymous) 2016-02-02 02:41 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, no, Bucky always goes for the worst interpretation... But actually what I meant, was that by any reasonable standard, it would be Bucky with the prior claim on Steve, not Sam, especially since they were lovers as well as friends in Brooklyn in this version of the story... Though a generous view of it might be that James does think of himself as someone different from the old Bucky, as I understood part 6 to say?

Re: more for less, 5/?

(Anonymous) 2016-02-02 03:10 am (UTC)(link)
Got it, sorry! Yes, you're right - this version of Bucky does think of himself as someone different.